Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 02.07.2025 01:12

Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
How To Train Your Dragon remake trades animated magic for money-hungry mediocrity - AV Club
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Thank you.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Jessie J breast cancer: singer undergoes surgery after diagnosis - BBC
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Why would my husband cheat on me with an ugly fat woman?
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
How long does it take to see results from drinking whey protein shakes?
What’s next?
Russia can stop this any time.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Has anyone tried Deepseek V3? Does it work?
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Mya Lesnar, daughter to WWE legend Brock Lesnar, wins national title in shot put - ESPN
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.